Why starter homes became a non-starter

The 2019 election campaign has officially begun – and the National Audit Office couldn’t have picked a better (or worse!) time to publish statistics which discredited a significant pillar of government housing policy. Or should I say non-statistics?

This week, the NAO revealed that not a single home was built on the back of plans to create 200,000 new homes for first-time buyers under 40.

The Starter Homes scheme, proposed in 2014, aimed to sell properties on ex-industrial land at a 20% discount. But legislation never got off the ground as the scheme’s flaws became painfully apparent.

I must admit, I completely forgot about the Starter Homes proposal after it was initially floated. As it faded into oblivion, I was more interested in the mixed consequences of the Help to Buy equity loan and to a much softer degree, the Help to Buy Isa. But the failure of Starter Homes was expensive (£174m was spent on acquiring land for the scheme) and caused a significant shortfall in new homes being built, just as nearly everybody was reaching agreement that housing supply desperately needed to be boosted.

You may also like...

This Post Has One Comment

  1. Avatar

    I am a 21-year-old first-time buyer, which I am proud of in this day and age where there is less opportunity for first-time buyers to get on the housing ladder. It is becoming increasingly difficult for us young people to get on the housing ladder. This is why I admire your work helping young people with their money which we need.

Leave a Reply

1 + 4 =

Share on facebook
Share on pinterest
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp