Has the short-term credit market reached a new low with ‘Loans for Poor People’?

Online loan companies and brokers are using tawdry tactics to try and attract vulnerable customers – what can we do to make sure this doesn’t have terrible consequences?

by iona bain

New rules were ushered in this year to ensure that the term “independent financial adviser’ can only be used to describe someone with top qualifications and the ability to recommend all kinds of products to consumers. But what happens if we chop off the word ‘independent’? Well, just about anybody can pass themselves off as a ‘financial adviser’ – even promoters of quick fix loans that could do more harm than good.

I have come across a site called “Loans for Poor People”, which recently appeared on a forum for real financial advisers. The individual behind this firm calls himself a financial adviser on Linkedin and various blogging sites. It is not a joke, as far as I know, even though the website absurdly states that it is ‘designed for the deprived’.

I have never come across a more dehumanising name for a financial services outfit than “Loans for Poor People”.

What’s more, the Office of Fair Trading recently raised alarm bells over the damaging slogans used by the short-term loan sector, such as ‘no credit checks’ and ‘get cash ASAP’. I have seen some of this flippant language used by firms like LFPP on forums, and have reported my concerns to the watchdog. It is now looking into my complaint and assures me it is taking it very seriously, given that this firm does not appear to show up on its public register.

Stuart Carmichael at the Debt Support Trust agreed that this company’s title was exploitative. He said: “I was amazed to see the company is promoting loans for people in an IVA & bankruptcy. I’m not sure whether the people behind this are foolish and targeting the deprived or unethical and aware of the error they are making. As an intermediary, they will get paid when people take a loan from another company. Most people in a deprived situation will do anything for credit, so this company probably feel they can maximise their profits by targeting people in a desperate situation.”

The title suggests that people who are in a vulnerable position should self-identify as ‘poor’ or ‘deprived’, and that the magical cure-all for that desperate predicament is simply the right loan at the right interest rate. If such people really are in need of help, surely an ethical and responsible ‘financial adviser’ would seek to lay out all their options, including debt advice charities and the Citizens Advice Bureau. It is not clear whether an applicant for a loan on the site would receive such information.

Church Action on Poverty, a Christian social justice company in the UK, released a report earlier this year which highlighted the stigmatic terms attached to people in financial difficulty, and rightly argued that they deserved more compassion and better understanding.

Firms like LFPP are trying their utmost to promote products, which may be totally unsuitable for many consumers, under the auspices of financial advice. Thankfully, they will not always succeed, as many savvy consumers will not fall for it.

But history tells us that the public is not necessarily alive to false marketing, mis-selling and poor advice – far from it. And the number of young people who are going online for financial information cannot be underestimated. It’s a recipe for disaster.

LFPP says it is neither a broker nor a lender. Instead, it matches ‘poor’ customers to the most suitable loans on the market for, apparently, no fees. Mr Carmichael said that the firm is likely to be paid commission every time if refers somebody to their service. But it is a mystery as to which third party firms obtain your details from this ‘matching service’, whether they would be adequately regulated and what kind of costs will be involved during the process. After all, the terms and conditions page simply links to a different website where you can apply for a loan instantly.

Of course, it’s hard to see what the regulators could do about the uncontrollable jungle that is the internet. But if you have doubts about a firm, you can call the Office of Fair Trading consumer helpline. You can also search its public registry to see if a firm has a consumer credit license. You can report firms on social media sites who use demeaning terms to describe certain sections of society. You are, by no means, powerless.

4 Comments

Filed under Loans, Payday loans, Personal Finance, Technology

4 Responses to Has the short-term credit market reached a new low with ‘Loans for Poor People’?

  1. I have to concur with many of the comments made in this blog.
    I run a UK loan brokerage company, which we operate, not only within the law, but also with greatest respect for our customers. Unfortunately, many of our competitors do not operate within the law, guidelines, or the same values, and this is detremental to the everyone who operates in the industry. I myself have reported companies to the OFT, where there has been blatant disregard for the law, however the OFT seem to turn a blind in many cases.

    Take one example – the site didn’t operate ethically – the things they stated on the site were just not true, and either not permitted within the guidlines, or not in the spirit, however more importantly, the site which identified itself as being a Limited Company, was operating with a sole trader licence. The licencing rules state that a licence is not transferrable between the 2 entities, however when this was pointed out to the OFT they simply brushed it aside, and replied that it was OK. OK – It’s illegal!!! Do their staff even know the laws?

    In fact, there has been more done by Google recently to cull bad companies/individuals, than the OFT, which is great, but also so wrong.
    So, it is as much frustrating for us guys on the inside as it is to everyone else.

  2. Bailey

    I saw you on Keiser Max today and I believe the young people in the UK are deliberately being set up to have their future robbed to pay for the debt based society that has exploited every other avenue for accumulating more debt. Apart from the fact that the young do not vote, under 18s get absolutely no representation what so ever and I think the voting age needs to come down to 16 and voting needs to be compulsory. Parents of under 16s should have extra votes as they represent more than one person. The young are ignored AND unrepresented in parliament. Thats not a coincidence. @UKYoungVotes

  3. PiRat

    Cracking down on pay-day-lenders is only going to hurt poor people even more and they will have to turn to the black market, you’ve seen the movies, you know what happens if you don’t pay.

  4. CassiusClay

    Nice article but perhaps the real subject here isn’t the de-humanizing terminology used on these sites but rather the fact that over one million British people are having to use pay day loans to survive. This is a shocking statistic and says a lot about where the UK is heading. Debt seems to be baked into the very fabric of society. Unless, of course, you’re one of the people de-humanized enough to make money from other people’s debt. And there are a lot of those around. Everything, as I am sure you are aware, has been financialized and this has set a dangerous precedent. With interest rates at zero and the impossibility of making money through saving, it is literally impossible for the average man on the street to survive. Some would advise to invest in stocks and shares but that’s just a quick way to lose your money unless you’re part of the elite club. It is becoming apparent to most people that financial “products” benefit those that sell them and nobody else. It doesn’t matter how you word the advert, the problem is much deeper than that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>