Are young people being unfairly rejected (& financially harmed) by Santander?

Herald Scotland

Iona Bain

It has already been lambasted for chopping the rate on its current account for half a million customers. Now it has emerged that Santander is rejecting a number of younger applicants for the popular 123 account, leaving a black mark on their credit file and potentially harming their financial prospects.Santander first launched the 123 current account in 2012, promising to pay one per cent on balances between £1,000 and £2,000, two per cent on balances between £2,000 and £3,000 and a market-leading three per cent on balances between £3,000 and £20,000. It also offered similarly tiered cashback on household bills and council tax payments.

 The rejection is now registered on Mr Parker’s credit file, possibly affecting his rating in future. That’s because Santander carries out “hard” searches on applicants’ credit files, as opposed to “soft” searches which do not show up and leave your credit rating untouched, regardless of whether you have been accepted for the product or not.Banks carry out credit checks on prospective applicants for accounts but usually only the poorest or those with serious debt problems struggle to get approved for mainstream products.

Incorrect details on your credit file (which may not be your fault), a short history at your current address, lack of borrowing history or a failure to register on the electoral roll all make refusal more likely.

Repeated hard searches and rejections for credit can undermine your credit rating, making it more difficult (or even impossible) to get approved by lenders in future and raising the interest you have to pay even if you are accepted.

Disgruntled customers have taken to Santander’s social media pages to complain of rejections for the 123 account, despite having been approved for market-leading products elsewhere. One told the bank on Facebook that he had been declined twice for the 123 current account, despite being accepted by two credit card companies following the first rejection.

A spokesman for Santander confirmed that credit searches are carried out on applicants for the 123 account and that a record is left with the credit reference agency, regardless of the decision outcome. “All customers have the right to appeal, but we would expect this to involve additional information being provided that wasn’t available for the initial decision in order for it to be overturned.”

She said “a very small number” of applications were rejected.

Customers who already have the account are being urged to sit tight despite the rate cut. Martin Lewis said savers don’t want to lose out on two and a half months of high interest. “Even at 1.5 per cent interest, right now, for those with £10,000 to £20,000, it would still be the best paying place for most to put easy access savings in.”

Other current account providers paying high interest, such as Lloyds Bank and TSB, are widely predicted to trim their rates in light of the base rate fall.

Regular savings accounts may now be the best option for those hunting good interest. The downside is that regular savers accounts usually last just 12 months. After that, you may be able to start up a new version of the account or failing that, shop around for a new rate. The best regular savers account is currently offered by Nationwide, which gives you five per cent if you switch to the building society for your main current account. You need to have paid in at least £750 a month for three months previously to qualify and you can pay in up to £500 each month.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: